Researchers believe they’ve come up with a new, more accurate method for determining the strength of surface gravity on distant, faint stars. And painting more accurate pictures of stars is vital to studying the alien worlds that orbit them.
“If you don’t know the star, you don’t know the planet,” University of British Columbia’s Jaymie Matthews, a co-author on the research published last week in Science Advances, said in a statement. You have to determine the strength of gravity on a star’s surface before you can calculate its size and mass, assuming the star isn’t close enough to measure directly.
When scientists go looking for alien exoplanets — ones that sit far outside our solar system — they rely entirely on those planets’ host stars. Measuring the way a star’s light appears to flicker and dim from Earth’s perspective allows scientists to calculate an astonishing number of things about the planets transiting around that star, including whether it’s the right size and distance from its star to hold liquid water. But to make those calculations, you need accurate stellar measurements. Otherwise, you might misjudge the size of a planet. That’s a problem when you’re looking for worlds that could host life as we know it, since you want to track down planets that are small and rocky like Earth.
Lots of the stars imaged by the Kepler space telescope are too far away or dim for scientists to study the planets around them effectively. That’s where the new technique, called the autocorrelation function timescale technique (timescale technique for short) comes in. Led by University of Vienna’s Thomas Kallinger, researchers from Europe, Canada and Australia determined that using the timescale of variations in a star’s brightness might be more accurate for determining gravity than the degree of brightness itself.
