Renewed efforts to replace the Interstate 5 Bridge have produced a fair amount of media coverage recently. But a combination of assumptions and misunderstandings have inaccurately portrayed my stance on this critical issue.
To set the record straight, the I-5 Bridge must be replaced. It does not adequately serve the nearly 2.5 million residents of the Vancouver-Portland metro area.
But merely replacing the bridge will not eliminate our gridlock.
Estimates say that replacing the I-5 Bridge would save southbound morning commuters about one minute in traffic assuming no crashes or obstructions in the roadway. You read that correctly — one minute.
Replacing the I-5 Bridge without constructing an additional bridge is unproductive and fiscally irresponsible. We must create a plan to do both.