Today's Paper Donate
Newsletters Subscribe
Tuesday,  May 13 , 2025
To search stories before 2011, click here to access our archives.

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Spill is not a winner for fish

By Ken Earlywine, Vancouver
Published: January 21, 2018, 6:00am

This is in response to the Jan. 18 story, “Spill decision ‘big win’ for fish,” praising the decision to increase the spill over spillways of the Columbia and Snake River dams, saying it is a big win for endangered spring Chinook. It might be good for them but will be a negative for other endangered fish and animals elsewhere, threatened by global warming.

Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of non-carbon megawatts will be replaced each year with carbon-based generation. Was this not considered in the equation for protecting endangered species? Ultimately, warm rivers from climate change threaten all salmonids in the Northwest. High flows over spillways increase harmful dissolved gases. Ultimately, not spilling may be the best environmental choice.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...