Monday, September 21, 2020
Sept. 21, 2020

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: Prudently plan for light rail


Wes Cartwright is spot on (“Plan for light rail in future,” Our Readers’ Views, Nov. 26) when he writes that the new Interstate 5 Bridge needs to have at least the structural capability to someday support light rail. It is arrogant for us to argue that decades from now folks neither need nor want light rail. We may not want or need it now, but we must not shut the door on the concept.

The highway department provides a good example of this kind of thinking. When they build an overpass to span two lanes of highway, they build the overpass wide enough to span three or four lanes. Then, decades later, when the highway needs widening the overpasses don’t need to be touched. This is good engineering practice and prudent use of public money.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter