<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: New bridge will be difficult

By Joe Krajewski, Vancouver
Published: January 18, 2019, 6:00am

We are finally moving forward with replacing the two interstate bridges that are structurally deficient and seismically vulnerable. Lots to consider:

First, there is a rapidly developing waterfront east and west of the existing bridges that will be completed before bridge construction even starts. The developments as proposed create a narrow corridor for new bridges.

Second, the minimum clearance under the structure is required to be 135 feet. Anything less than this handicaps shipping. A tall, fixed structure will be aesthetically ugly and severely detract from the revitalized waterfront. The cost and construction time would more than double, and project length will be miles longer in each direction.

Third, the I-5 congestion period will be 12 hours per day or worse by the time construction starts. Fast-track project development, Alternative Project Delivery Procurement and Accelerated Bridge Design and Construction are absolutely necessary.

Fourth, I-5 is a designated seismic lifeline road that is usable immediately after an earthquake. The interstate bridges are not. We should consider building a new bus, truck, train and pedestrian bridge in the vicinity of the existing 1908 railroad bridge, to provide an emergency road, reduce existing congestion, improve busing and provide a temporary alternative route during interstate bridge construction.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...