Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Life / Entertainment

‘Handmaid’s Tale’ getting to boring

Silent seething, slow segues, rob story of urgency, energy

By Hank Stuever, The Washington Post
Published: June 7, 2019, 6:03am

The headlines keep providing all the context Hulu’s “The Handmaid’s Tale” will ever need: There’s a notable drop in birthrates; Bible classes are offered in public schools; Facebook accepts no responsibility for its users’ distortions of fact. And recent votes in state legislatures in Georgia, Missouri, Louisiana and other states seek to limit abortion to a prohibitive degree, bringing the ultimate goal within reach — a Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade.

Chilled and angered by these developments, protests often include women who show up to statehouses wearing the familiar red robes and white bonnets required of the fictional handmaids of Gilead, a militaristic theocracy once known as the United States of America, first envisioned in Margaret Atwood’s 1985 novel and brought vividly to life in showrunner Bruce Miller’s acclaimed series. A red-robe event certainly gets a message across, but the more it happens, the more the image loses some of its potency, or can even be misconstrued as free publicity for the show.

It’s also no surprise to hear the show’s most loyal fans talk about the fatigue that comes from watching too many episodes in a row. It is consistently depressing and sometimes just too close for comfort.

While Atwood prepares to release a new novel in September — a sequel the author says takes place 15 years after “The Handmaid’s Tale” — Miller and company often struggle to move their ongoing story of June (Elisabeth Moss) along at a pace that is both consistent and intriguing. They’ll rev it up in one episode, only to ramp it down in the next; they’ll terrify us in one moment and then rectify a life-threatening crisis almost as fast. The show is full of pauses and quiet close-ups (mostly of June, who narrates). There’s a lot of silent seething and slow-motion segues between plot developments.

The third season, which began streaming June 5 with three new episodes, sustains many of the qualities that first made the show such a talker (and award winner), with memorable performances and a fascinating vision of government oppression and cruelty in the name of God. As dour as the viewing experience can be, that’s the good news.

The bad news is that the first half of this season (six episodes were made available for this review) often lapses into the realm of the deadly dull, making long and redundant loops around its original premise and revisiting already established resentments and animosities between characters.

In a land where sinners and suspected insurgents are publicly executed and then strung up to rot in town squares, June continues to demonstrate a knack for skirting past the worst consequences. She’s a fighter who keeps getting forgiven for her transgressions. In June’s final days as Offred, the handmaiden assigned to Commander Fred Waterford (Joseph Fiennes) and his wife, Serena Joy (Yvonne Strahovski), she delivered a baby daughter, Nicole, who was secretly fathered by Fred’s chauffeur, Nick (Max Minghella).

At the end of Season 2, June convinced Serena, who had recently petitioned Gilead’s rulers to let women have a say in government (and had a finger chopped off for her troubles), that Nicole would never have a full life in Gilead. While the Waterford mansion went up in flames, Serena helped Offred escape with the baby to Canada. But Offred, who still hopes to one day rescue her older daughter, broke her promise to Serena and instead gave the baby to Ofjoseph (Alexis Bledel), who was whisked away to the border in a van driven by the resistance.

And so, in this season, it’s all about the baby, the baby, the baby, the baby. There is now more talk of babies in “The Handmaid’s Tale” than you’d find at a weekday Mommy and Me playgroup — too much even for a show that’s a protracted metaphor about the reproductive rights of women. Almost immediately, a grieving Serena decides she wants her baby back (I’ll leave out the spoiler details of where the infant and Ofjoseph wind up after last season’s cliffhanger), leading Fred and the rulers of Gilead to treat the infant’s kidnapping as an international crisis, Elian Gonzalez-style.

After a period of punishment at the Red Center, June is reassigned to become Ofjoseph, ostensibly to bear a child for Commander Joseph Lawrence (Bradley Whitford), an intellectual leader among Gilead’s policy framers. As viewers learned last season, Commander Lawrence is capriciously contradictory — helping the handmaids and the baby to escape, while taking a sadistically ambivalent, mainly academic interest in the dystopian nightmare he helped create. For a character with so much potential and insider knowledge, it feels as if the writers don’t know what to make of him.

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...