<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: End fossil fuel subsidies

By Merv Murphy, Vancouver
Published: December 2, 2021, 6:00am

Fossil fuel tax subsidies, the opposite of a carbon tax, tilt the field to dirtier fuels against cleaner alternatives and demonstrate populist democracy. No politician wants discomforted voters at home or at the pump, hence G-20 countries, per Bloomberg, offered direct subsidies worth more than $3.3 trillion between 2015 and 2019 on coal, oil, gas and fossil-fuel-fired power.

The pandemic reduced demand and prices and offered governments an opportunity to reduce subsidies, but the reduced prices are an economic stimulus, are popular and improve reelection chances.

Governments will this year explicitly under-price energy relative to supply costs by nearly $600 trillion. The implicit under-price relative to social costs to health and environment could be 10 times that.

Eliminating explicit subsidies by 2025 would reduce global carbon dioxide emissions by 36 percent, increase global tax revenues by 3.8 percent on GDP, and global warming might even track toward 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels per IMF estimates.

Eliminating implicit and explicit subsidies seems as probable as levitation for transportation.

If the price of gasoline upsets you, do the droughts, fires, floods and more set you free?

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...