Wednesday, March 3, 2021
March 3, 2021

Linkedin Pinterest

Letter: Keep bridge, add tunnel


The Community Advisory Group working on the Columbia River crossing problem seems to be hellbent on making a wrong decision. All we ever hear about is a “replacement” bridge for the I-5 Bridge pair. A new “replacement” bridge somewhere near the existing pair would have all kinds of problems.

First, the purists will want a fixed bridge as opposed to a drawbridge, but such bridges are expensive and take up a great deal of space for on-ramps, service roads, and other infrastructure. A replacement drawbridge would give us a couple of extra lanes of traffic at best.

What’s wrong with keeping the existing bridge pair? They appear to be well-built, and have never failed in 100 years of operation. Clearly they’re insufficient to handle the traffic, so why not keep them and supplement them with something new?

A tunnel could be feasible. Tunnels have their own special problems and require an extensive geologic study, but they also have advantages. One is location. A bridge halfway between the I-5 and I-205 bridges would be impossible because Portland International Airport is in the way, but a tunnel terminating in that general area might work. Service roads and other infrastructure could be built between the two bridges without affecting the airport.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Commenting is no longer available on Please visit our Facebook page to leave comments on local stories.