<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  April 17 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Support electric vehicle tunnel

By Sam Churchill, Hayden Island
Published: June 15, 2021, 6:00am

Spending $4 billion to $5 billion for an Interstate 5 Bridge replacement for a minute improvement in Portland commute times looks like a bad investment. Especially if you’re paying the toll. TriMet says Vancouver light rail will help.

The argument for light rail into Vancouver is two-fold: one, it reduces congestion because Vancouver commuters can use the rail. Two, federal bucks pay for it. This pickle seems like the CRC battle all over again.

I hang on to the belief that both Oregon and Washington will come around to the advantages of a tunnel for rubber-tired electric transport. They can pick you up at your house and deliver you to your destination. It’s also cheaper compared to a $5 billion bridge across the Columbia (that doesn’t help congestion).

If you live on Hayden Island, you’d be nuts to think a 12-18 lane viaduct towering 50 feet overhead will improve commute times. It won’t improve commute times for anyone.

Fix the bridge, sure. But put in a (cheap) electric vehicle tunnel connecting Vancouver to Portland. Is it the best transportation solution for people on both sides of the river? Maybe yes. Maybe no.

But DOTs and transit agencies will never support it. There’s nothing in it for them. Simple as that.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...