<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  April 24 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Politics / Clark County Politics

Woodland passes budget, waits to add replacing leaking reservoir

By Matthew Esnayra, The Daily News
Published: December 29, 2022, 1:37pm

WOODLAND — The Woodland City Council approved a $36 million budget for 2023, leaving several city water projects off the table.

The council again delayed utility rate increases for water and sewage, which would help pay for the tabled projects.

Five of the seven council members voted Dec. 19 to pass a budget that did not include funding for replacing the city’s asbestos-lined water pipes, fixing a leaking reservoir or restoring water filters.

Councilmembers Carol Rounds and Jennifer Rowland were absent from the meeting.

Public Works Director Tracy Coleman said the council could add an amendment to the budget later to include the projects once city staff determine how they will be paid for.

Projects

The Washington State Department of Health is mandating Woodland repair its reservoir or build an entirely new one because the reservoir — which stores the city’s water — is leaking 10.5 million gallons a year. Eventually, the city may have to limit water usage.

The city also needs to replace water filters because they have reached the end of their life span, Coleman said, as well as repair or replace 13 water pipes that have asbestos in the concrete. Only one pipeline on West Scott Avenue will likely be replaced in 2023.

Despite the needed repairs, Coleman said the water is safe to drink, and if it wasn’t, residents would be notified immediately.

Woodland’s water comes from an aquifer beneath the North Fork of the Lewis River, she added.

Morning Briefing Newsletter envelope icon
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.

‘Kicking the can’

At the Dec. 19 meeting, the council also voted to delay the next planned water rate increase until May and the sewer rate increase to November.

This is the third time since the new rates passed in 2020 that incremental hikes have been delayed.

Before the vote, Mayor Will Finn — who didn’t vote — expressed concerns that delaying the rate increase could only worsen the problem.

“Not only are they [the rates] going to be back up again in November, they’re going to go back up double than what they are right now … what we’re doing is kicking the can down the road,” Finn said.

Finn echoed statements made in previous meetings that the council is dealing with the indecisions of previous administrations who punted on significant infrastructure issues instead of dealing with them — and today’s council is doing the same thing.

Councilmember Melissa Doughty pushed back on the mayor’s comments.

“I don’t feel like I’m pushing it down the road, I feel that we’re spreading it slightly to the right,” she said.

Councilmember DeeAnna Holland felt the date change to May and November held political motives, as May is when people file to run for office, and November is the month of the general election.

“It sounds like politicking when you push it off to May and then to November,” Holland said.

Holland was the only councilmember to vote no on delaying the rates at the meeting.

Finn also said he would like to change the financial threshold for low-income residents who are unable to pay for water and sewer utilities to go from $20,000 a year and $25,000 per household, to $25,000 a year for everyone.

Councilmember Monte Smith said he would like to attach to the threshold a percentage increase each year “to make up for the cost of living.”

Loading...
Tags