<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Bridge program needs to answer

By Bob Ortblad, Seattle
Published: September 10, 2022, 6:00am

The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program has spent millions to manufacture public consent for its “Modified Locally Preferred Alternative,” a green-washed copy of the failed Columbia River Crossing. The IBR has exploited equity to promote its locally preferred alternative. The poor will get noise, pollution, and the danger of traversing the steepest (4 percent grade) interstate bridge on balder tires. The IBR has staged a Kabuki theater of citizen advisory groups and produced a score of videos with bureaucrats and young interns touting its locally preferred alternative design. The 1,670 @IBRProgram tweets are full of platitudes, puffery, and jargon, but few facts.

These tweets have received few and negative public comments. Critics have demanded IBR create 3D graphics for the LPA’s bridge, interchanges, and bike/pedestrian ramps. The IBR has not responded.

Unfortunately, local municipalities and agencies have trustingly accepted the IBR’s manufactured consent and approved the LPA. The IBR should stop wasting public money to pervert public opinion, and start answering true public opinion questions.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...