Opinion

The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.

News / Opinion / Columns

Westneat: Seattle schools fight misses point

By Danny Westneat

Published: September 12, 2022, 6:01am

As Seattle teachers and administrators were headed for another strike the other day, state Sen. Reuven Carlyle, a Seattle Democrat, tried to appeal to the better angels of community reason. Citing all the pandemic disruptions of the past few years, he called on both sides, in the “spirit of grace and humility,” to make concessions to avoid this strike.

“This is not the year for an adult fight,” he concluded.

Boy did he get blistered for saying that.

Adult-fighting is Seattle’s love language, senator; you should know that by now. Complete with sign-waving, sidewalk-rallying and protest chanting, it’s one of the main ways we communicate around here.

I don’t have as personal a stake in this strike, because both my Seattle Public Schools kids are now off in college. The last strike, in 2015, kept them out of middle school for a week. That one went well for the teachers, as the cause was widely supported by the broader community, and by most school parents, including me.

This one has been more of a reach, as Carlyle was suggesting.

In 2015, Seattle was booming, school enrollment was surging, and teachers and schools around the state really were being seriously shortchanged. The problem now is that enrollment has dropped. The district is expecting budget shortfalls escalating up to $128 million in 2025.

When the adult-fighting abates, the two sides have some more pressing questions to ask. The biggest is: Why are all these families leaving Seattle schools? Some of it was the pandemic (people delaying kindergarten), some of it demographic, and some is probably due to the high cost of living in the city.

But the truth is they have no idea. Nobody is asking parents — which is typical for Seattle schools. The point is: The district can’t fix whatever’s ailing it through guesswork.

It also isn’t clear what all that post-2015 money surge is doing. A lot of it went to salaries, which was needed. But education researcher Marguerite Roza notes that in the past decade, the total staffing of Seattle Public Schools has also ballooned 32 percent, from 5,300 employees to 7,000. “Seeing a lot of this around the country: Districts adding staff while losing students,” she wrote.

This matters because much of this current dispute has been about staffing — about teachers saying they need more support for special education students. Then you’ve got to wonder: Where are those 1,700 additional employees? Administrative bloat?

I know — I’m supposed to answer questions, not ask them. All I can say here is that it seems a top-to-bottom audit of this district is in order. The pressure to spend money more efficiently — and get results for it — is only going to ratchet up as the enrollment declines.

Finally, the era is more volatile than it was in 2015. There’s been a concerted campaign to bring down the public schools, part of an aligned conservative movement for lower taxes (and book bans and the sanitization of history, a related story). Why give them ammunition? Public schools are the indicator species for the health of a city. And with enrollment declining, Seattle’s are clearly hurting and in need of some recovery.

Seattle likes to either take it to the streets, or form blue-ribbon committees. This is a plea that when the dust settles, we move on to the latter as quickly as possible. Instead of more adult-fighting within the family.

Support local journalism

Related Stories