<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Radical plans hurt salmon

By Larry Carey, Vancouver
Published: May 19, 2023, 6:00am

What isn’t radical about salmon? Early on, managing fish staunchly got one-sided. Had shared opinions been used, salmon would have improved. But radical federal managers had a selfish plan. It was to have only wild fish spawning.

Hatchery and wild fish already had blended for over a century. Now they overwork just one fish, most not genetically pure, gaining nothing. Having one certain fish spawning is impossible. Straying fish incrementally reduce wild fish gene pools leaving the planet.

Why is anybody fishing? The thrill is gone, from federal manipulation of science and overharvesting northern nursery waters. They deny biggest pieces of the resource sustainment.

I just had my best year of not fishing. Supported insanity made me leave. Fish caught yearly turned to nothing. Why try? A ghost chase, nowhere near good memories, impossible anymore.

Salmon need to be working. Repression is stopping this resource. Every salmon needs to help, but wild fish stole our enjoyment and bounty. Predictable poor returns.

Only wild salmon spawning is so unreal it heats my blood and my ink. No wonder. Salmon are not surviving, as radical leaders stonewall salmon with no way out. They stop life, cull, kill or waste and call it recovery.

Hmm.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...