The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
What to make of Donald Trump’s nominations of the Fox News team to the Trump Cabinet? An expert on wrestling to take down the Department of Education? An opponent of public health to run Health and Human Services? What kind of game is this? Is he really just trolling us to see how far outside the mainstream he can go?
Yes and no. He’s not really trolling us, if by us you mean people like me, who didn’t vote for him. Frankly, he doesn’t give a damn what we think. The more upset we are, the happier it seems to make him. We don’t matter, not at all, not for two years, anyway.
The people he’s trolling are the Republican members of the United States Senate. Any four of them can put the kibosh on an outlandish appointee who requires Senate confirmation. Are there at least four Republicans left in that formerly august body who will vote no on nominees who have no business serving all of us in the jobs they’ve been appointed to?
Maybe. On a few of them. That’s the game I see playing out.
Nominate as many extremists as you can. The more the better. The more outlandish the better. There are only so many that Republicans will block. The more extremists/crazies/should-be-unconfirmable nominees the Senate faces, the more they will end up confirming in exchange for the few they will block.
You put up a fight, force the Senate to say no and virtually guarantee that whoever comes next — who will be just as bad on policy and experience grounds — will surely get the nod. Maybe one rejection will be enough to slide Pete Hegseth or Linda McMahon or even RFK Jr. through. Or maybe you can persuade enough Republican senators, after one or two brutal battles, to take a vacation and let Trump make recess appointments of those who cannot survive the process?
How many Senate Republicans will take seriously their duty — their sworn obligation — to advise and consent on the president’s nominations to high office?
This much is clear. This president is making his choices based on different criteria than his predecessors, Democrat and Republican. This president has taken the requirement of loyalty to an extreme. It matters more than anything else. And what he wants loyalty to is not only the president personally but an agenda that involves literally destroying the bureaucracies they are taking over.
In some cases, that means real destruction — of the Justice Department’s independence, of the Education Department’s literal existence, of the United Nations’ role in the world, of the people who Trump holds responsible for undermining him in his first term.
There is another factor, which is clearly almost as important — being good on television, preferably on Fox News. Trump is the first president who considers being a television host an important qualification. Why wouldn’t he, after all, since that was his qualification for assuming the position of the most powerful person on the planet?
We will have radical loyalists with good TV ratings going through the confirmation process, and we are about to see how many good Republicans take their oaths seriously and are not afraid of Trump. The answer is almost surely not enough.
Most Americans don’t watch Fox News. If Trump has his way, and they want to watch America in action, they will have no choice.
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.
Support local journalism
Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.
Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.
