To search stories before 2011, click here to access our archives.
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
If you find yourself thinking about politics, talking about politics or worrying about politics just about every day, you’re not alone. In fact, you’re pretty much average, based on a recent poll by Elway Research for Cascade PBS.
In a survey of 403 registered Washington voters in early April, 58 percent said they’d had a conversation about government, current events or politics in the previous 24 hours. Another 19 percent had such a conversation in the previous two or three days and 10 percent within the past week.
Asked what that conversation was about, 63 percent said something to do with President Donald Trump or his administration. Two-thirds said they look at news every day, and 51 percent said they are paying more attention to news about government and politics than they used to. Only 8 percent said they were paying less attention to it.
This being Washington, where Trump has done poorly in all three of his presidential bids, it’s probably not too surprising that slightly less than one-third had a positive or optimistic reaction to the Trump administration so far, while 53 percent had a negative reaction. Compared to three months into his first term, those surveyed were a bit less likely to say they thought this second go-round for Trump was changing things for the better and considerably more likely to say things were changing for the worse.
Those numbers line up with feelings about Trump’s style of leadership, with 63 percent saying they disapprove or strongly disapprove of it, compared to 56 percent in 2017; 35 percent said they approve or strongly approve of it, down from 40 percent eight years ago.
Also noteworthy, if not surprising, is that far fewer people surveyed this time said they thought things were pretty much the same as before Trump was sworn in. In 2017, 17 percent said they that thought he was “not really bringing much change” in his first four months. This year, the “not much change” contingent is down to just 6 percent. It would appear that most of those were leaning toward change for the worse.
Blast from the past
Rep. Michael Baumgartner, Eastern Washington’s freshman GOP congressman, is receiving notice for a recent proposal to get the federal government involved in controlling college sports. Among other things, it would dissolve the NCAA, create a commission whose leader would be nominated by the president, and redistribute money earned by athletes under name, image likeness deals.
In 2014, as a state senator, Baumgartner introduced a bill requiring the University of Washington men’s basketball team to play Gonzaga every year. The proposal was introduced with two days left in the session, when any chance of a vote was nil.
The “end the NCAA” proposal has far more time to percolate, considering the 19th Congress could go until December 2026. It was sent to the House Education and Workforce Committee, with no word yet on a hearing.
State to dodge DOGE
As the Elway Poll shows, there are some people in Washington who are happy with what the Trump administration is doing. Chief among them, perhaps, would be Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen and state GOP chairman, who introduced a bill for Washington to form its own Department of Government Efficiency.
WA DOGE would be tasked with auditing state agencies, rooting out duplication and unnecessary functions, and fighting red tape. Unlike its national counterpart, which is not a real department and not beholden to Congress, WA DOGE would operate under the Legislature and submit reports to lawmakers and the governor.
A news release announcing the bill describes it as “currently being considered by the State Government and Tribal Relations Committee.” That might be overselling the bill’s prospects a tad. Although the bill was referred to that committee, the panel has no hearings scheduled as the deadline for considering new bills has long passed and the session is due to end Sunday.
Morning Briefing Newsletter
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.
