Wednesday,  March 19 , 2025

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Bridge decision is shortsighted

By Charles Humble, Vancouver
Published: February 17, 2025, 6:00am

The Camas City Council’s effort to torpedo a decade of work to replace the Interstate 5 Bridge is shortsighted and capricious.

The council is basing its decision on maintenance costs shared by Oregon and Washington to support the preferred light-rail option for mass transit on the bridge. It’s more than a little late in the game to raise these objections.

Officials from the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program, which is managing the process to fund and build the bridge, have produced ample evidence that light rail has the broad support of both Oregon and Clark County constituencies.

As the replacement program told the council, the decision will surely delay the construction of the bridge if not tank it altogether. Oregon’s $1 billion commitment to the project is a likely casualty if Clark County nixes light rail on the bridge. With that loss of funding and likely Oregon’s support, the I-5 Bridge will die another slow and unnecessary death.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...