I am writing in response to the recent editorial regarding the citizen petition to require voter approval before removing traffic lanes. While public discussion is important, some key points need clarification (“Streets petition stalls but concerns remain,” In Our View, Jan. 10).
First, Vancouver’s transportation plans underwent extensive community outreach and consultation starting as early as 2017. Citizens had ample opportunities to voice concerns back then, making criticisms now seem misplaced.
Second, the Columbia Street project has been a resounding success. Traffic is calmer, the street is safer and more bicycle-friendly, and anticipated parking problems have not materialized. This project demonstrates how thoughtful urban planning can enhance our city. Initial opposition has been proven unfounded and the results should serve as a positive precedent for future improvements.
Finally, the petition’s creators knowingly proposed illegal wording yet proceeded to collect signatures, wasting time and resources. The city’s validation of those signatures cost taxpayer money that could have been better used addressing real community needs.
Vancouver’s commitment to a multimodal transportation network promotes sustainability and safety. Let’s move forward with constructive dialogue instead of trying to undermine the public’s trust in the planning process.