BOISE, Idaho — Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys are again pushing back against the prosecution for allegedly providing the defense with minimal expert witness disclosures, calling them, for the most part, “abysmal,” according to the latest drop of court filings in the 30-year-old’s capital murder case.
These filings build on months of arguments by the defense over allegations that the disclosures, or written summaries of experts’ expected testimony, are vague and in violation of the court’s discovery deadlines. The defense also argued the prosecution’s recent supplemental filings, expanding on their witnesses’ testimony, gave them an advantage to review and tailor their disclosures around Kohberger’s experts.
“The state cannot be allowed to benefit at the expense of Mr. Kohberger’s right to a fair trial, confrontation, due process and assistance of counsel,” lead attorney Anne Taylor wrote. “The state cannot be allowed to ignore Mr. Kohberger’s rights, shirk its duty and get a free pass on the rules.”
She continued in the Monday filing, published on the court’s website Wednesday, that the prosecution “must be held to the limits of its timely disclosures.” The prosecution disputed this and said it has complied with the court’s deadlines.