Vancouver misses grant to improve connection between I-5 and SR 500
Monday, March 8, 2010
Vancouver lost out on a $147 million federal economic stimulus grant to improve the connection between state Highway 500 and Interstate 5.
The proposal included two new ramps originally developed as the northernmost pieces of the broader Columbia River Crossing project. State transportation planners eliminated the ramps at Highway 500 as part of a package of cost-saving cutbacks to the multibillion-dollar crossing project; instead, they tried to convince the Obama administration to build the ramps sooner as a separate economic stimulus project.
Now that the feds have rejected it, engineers are going back to Plan B.
“Capital construction costs for CRC don’t include this interchange,” said Mandy Putney, a spokeswoman for the bistate crossing office in Vancouver.
As currently planned, the scaled-down project may be most noticeable for the loss of access.
Engineers are planning to eliminate the ability of westbound motorists to come off SR 500 and merge right on I-5 to exit at Fourth Plain. Plans are to strip away that connection to reduce hazardous weaving and save money in the overall crossing project, which is still estimated to cost $2.6 billion to $3.6 billion. (Motorists will still be able to exit I-5 southbound to Fourth Plain).
City officials are worried about the loss of access from SR 500 to Fourth Plain.
“We find that the impacts to Vancouver, our residents and businesses would be severe and adverse, and cannot support such a loss of freeway access to our community,” outgoing Mayor Royce Pollard wrote on behalf of the city council in December.
Those concerns remain, said Matt Ransom, the city’s transportation planning manager.
“We’re still working with the project to resolve that issue,” Ransom said.
Neighbors’ concerns
Not everyone is wild about keeping the connection, however.
In the Shumway neighborhood, a variety of CRC-related freeway improvements means that keeping the 500-to-Fourth Plain connection would require sliding the existing ramp to the west — eating into dozens of properties on the west side of I-5.
Lisa Ghormley, vice chairwoman of the Shumway Neighborhood Association, said local homeowners will lose out. Plus, she said, freight traffic headed to the Port of Vancouver will increasingly cut through Fourth Plain due to the fact that a new light rail line is likely to impede traffic on Mill Plain Boulevard.
“I would like to have seen a more planned-out transportation system for the west side of this area,” Ghormley said.
Ransom counters that, even though a direct extension of Mill Plain a decade ago was intended to become the primary freight route to the port, Fourth Plain would also be needed to handle business access and trucks through the city’s west side.
“You needed to have both corridors to serve the demand,” he said.
As it stands, CRC project planners still intend to block westbound motorists on SR 500 from exiting on Fourth Plain.
One of three proposals approved
U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced last month that the Washington Department of Transportation received only one of the three projects it sought through the latest round of “shovel-ready” projects.
Engineers designed new ramps that would have carried motorists from 500 westbound to I-5 northbound and from I-5 southbound to 500 eastbound. Currently, motorists make those connections through a labyrinthine series of stops and turns on local roads.
Now, the new ramps will be dropped from the broader Columbia River Crossing project.
The Obama administration provided $35 million to build a 3.7-mile portion of a new 10.5-mile-long freeway in north Spokane.
The administration turned down the state DOT’s request for $147 million for the Highway 500 project, along with a separate request for $300 million to build portions of the new state Highway 520 bridge replacement across Lake Washington in the Seattle area.
Rate this
You must be logged in to rate this.
Current Rating :
Comments
View all 16 comments »
SR 500 was a stupid design from the very beginning. It was intentionally built half-@ssed with the thought that the intersections could be eliminated in the future because the money wasn't there to build it without them at the time.
wdkeisala — March 8, 2010 at 1:19 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Then, just as they worked toward finishing the removal of traffic lights from SR-500 and SR-14, what did they do?
They put traffic lights on the Padden Parkway. Brilliant.
JiveSoulBro — March 8, 2010 at 2:01 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
that's is just fantastic news! now we can keep people traveling 40 - 50mph on 39th Street, driving through the off-ramp STOP SIGNS and not stopping when people are in the crosswalks.....nice job Dept. of Transportation!!!
sdouglas — March 8, 2010 at 3:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Maybe they should of built SR500 rt in the first place!! Oh wait, then they wouldn't be able to raise taxes every few years and then post (Your hard tax dollars at work!!). Typical state engineers and planners....Gee lets half ass build it now and we will beg (steal)for the money later....Hmmmm
catfish297 — March 8, 2010 at 4:01 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Cost of 2010 Census: $14.7 Billion. The ship is sinking.
Snake_Plissken — March 8, 2010 at 4:24 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Sounds like they should let Joe's Place Farm be and use the money on this. Another Idea is take it out of the pentions of the people that designed it in the first place.
JonAlldritt — March 8, 2010 at 6:15 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Thirty years ago our Democratic Senators "Scoop" Jackson and Henry Magnusson were experts at bringing home endless amounts of federal money to support Washington projects. It is frustrating that our two Dem incumbents don't seem to have as much brute force power to bring home the bacon as the good old boys did, although times are certainly different now.
E_Terrific — March 8, 2010 at 6:31 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Don't worry, it's all politics, and it will never happen in this current economic time-line that is heavily impacting Government because states have failed with deficits. The new so called bridge will never happen! Gregoire is a liar! Oregon can barely pay for the Oregon State patrol. The crisis has effected SR 500, and it will end up being a defeat or a win of a new bridge not built because of a WA State deficit, and Oregon deficit budget crisis.
So do not let these left wing liberals create ego by taxing a 14% unemployment in Clark County. Craig Pridemore said it real clear on TV. The Citzen's of Clark County will pay either with a property tax, or a business tax, or a sales tax. No thanks Craig you will not get my vote to Tax us with a high unemployment rate with no steps shown to save current Jobs and Industry.
http://budgetandpolicy.org/ http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=711 http://www.craigpridemore.com/ no thanks! Vote No!
Craig are you kidding us? http://www.craigpridemore.com/index.php?page=display&id=6 Come on say something better than that!
JOKER — March 9, 2010 at 1:41 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Although it is upsetting that a major interchange we ALL know needs upgrading, at least we can look at it on the bright side if there is any...
What is the bright side you ask???
At least our federal government has found it necessary to keep from adding to the debt pot by turning down this (highly needed) project. Most likely though, it will go to some other state anyhow but then again maybe, it could be a sign of things to come with regards to the national debt... MAYBE!
For now, I guess we all just have to bite the bullet and accept the fact that this interchange will have to stay the way it is for awhile. Heck, the way things are going, maybe the federal government will renege on the funding for the I-5 bridge/lightrail project as well and that will upset a lot of people too. In my view, I'd take it or leave it either way.
goldenoldie — March 9, 2010 at 4:17 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
According to www.recovery.gov only 287.7 billion of the 787 billion stimulus package dollars have been awarded. The stimulus act was passed on Feb. 17th 2009 - so a year later they have only awarded about 1/3 of the money. This was supposed to be a short term get people working stimulus. Three years is not short term. Yet they are turning down shovel ready projects here and in Seattle. Are they waiting to get closer to reelection times so that they look better right before people vote? It's time to do what they said they would do and it's up to us to hold them accountable.
PDXPack — March 9, 2010 at 9:26 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Or login with: