The full importance of the Don Benton vs. Tim Probst race for state senator is starting to emerge. The picture will become more clear in the next week or so as a recount of ballots unfolds. Benton, the Republican incumbent, is expected to hold his narrow lead.
But the greater drama in which Benton is a key player is up in Olympia. Democrats hold a 26-23 control of the Senate (assuming Benton keeps his lead), but two Democrats have said they are interested in working with Republicans. If Probst wins (unlikely, though possible), the Democrats’ majority control would be 27-22 and thus immune to the philosophically wavering “roadkill” moderates, Rodney Tom of Bellevue and Tim Sheldon of Potlatch.
In Olympia, both parties’ power brokers already are counting on a Benton triumph. Democrats are considering various hybrids of power-sharing, ostensibly to keep Tom and Sheldon in the donkey’s corral and stave off any elephant stampede toward control. Caucus discussions will continue this week. Uncertainties persist about committee chairmanships and other aspects of majority control.
In the meantime, it is rather refreshing to see the state Senate apparently drifting toward some kind of bipartisan power-sharing. Democrats, of course, are terrified. Their caucus leader, Sen. Ed Murray of Seattle, made this not-so-oblique statement about power-sharing: “At what point do you become ineffective because you’ve entered into some sort of convoluted governing arrangement that doesn’t allow you to accomplish what you came down here for? I’m more concerned about the Senate functioning than with being majority leader.”