To their credit — and we’re certain many readers will disagree with this contention — Vancouver city councilors have made meaningful steps in recent years toward reducing the annual fireworks problem during days leading up to and including the Fourth of July. Those steps are explained below. And several more steps also could be taken to further alleviate the problem. The council is also commended for holding its attention on one of the city’s most frequently discussed, fiercely divisive and combustible issues. Many councilors say they receive more advice and complaints on both sides of this issue than just about any other topic.But the fireworks ban that the Vancouver City Council is considering is the wrong approach for several reasons.
First, Vancouver contains less than 40 percent of the population in Clark County, which includes eight cities and a large unincorporated area. Many unincorporated areas such as Salmon Creek, Hazel Dell and Orchards abut Vancouver city limits. Even if Vancouver banned all but “safe and sane” fireworks as is being considered, it would be unreasonable to expect a core of silence could exist within the greater community.
Second, enforcement of any fireworks ban would be difficult because of the multiple jurisdictions connected to the city.
Third, many people don’t even know whether they live inside or outside Vancouver city limits. A 2005 survey of 300 residents in areas being considered at the time for annexation showed that 28 percent of the respondents mistakenly believed they already lived inside Vancouver’s city limits. Such confusion would make enforcement of a fireworks ban even more challenging.