<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Reform campaign finance system

The Columbian
Published: November 14, 2012, 4:00pm

According to the New York Times, Barack Obama’s party spent $852.9 million and Mitt Romney’s party spent $752.3 million campaigning for the presidential race. While the super political action committees only account for a portion of the campaign funding, they can receive unlimited amounts of funding from individuals, corporations, and labor unions. Why are we allowing so much money from special interests to influence campaigning?

Campaign reform has been put on the back burner for years, with candidates having little to no intention of changing the current standards. In Great Britain, campaign reform laws allow independent organizations to only donate 988,000 pounds/$1.6 million up to 12 months prior to the election and no more than 800 pounds/$500 in the same month as an election. Additionally, political advertising is banned on radio and television, which leaves the newspaper as the main source for campaigning.

While the British laws are not perfect, the United States can use them as a template to start our own campaign reform to remove special interest from campaigns and allow all parties to campaign equality.

Heather Garrett

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...