<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Recent explosions ignite trepidation

The Columbian
Published: December 8, 2013, 4:00pm

In his Dec. 2 letter, “Risks studied before finalizing deal,” Port of Vancouver Commissioner Jerry Oliver says the port’s decision to approve an oil terminal “was not made lightly.”

There was the oil train explosion in Quebec on July 6 that killed 47. The port commissioners probably hoped that explosion was a fluke. But it wasn’t. On Nov. 8, 2013, there was another oil train explosion in Alabama involving new state-of-the-art oil tankers, T108s.

This fracked oil is more volatile than customary crude. For videos of the explosions, Google search “Oil train explosion in Quebec” and “Oil train explosion in Alabama.”

The Vancouver waterfront development will provide many more permanent jobs than the oil terminal, but it might not get finished if 10 miles of oil tankers file past the property daily. The risks of the oil terminal far exceed the benefits of 100 jobs.

Hundreds of people have already submitted comments to the Energy Facilities Site Evaluation Council to tell it why this terminal is not in our best interests. The deadline is Dec. 18. Send your comments by email to efsec@utc.wa.gov.

Don Steinke

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...