<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Shift focus to revive more wetlands

The Columbian
Published: December 18, 2013, 4:00pm

Reading the Dec. 14 story, “East Fork restoration takes long-term approach,” I applaud the Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership for its efforts on the East Fork of the Lewis River and anywhere they work to restore habitat, especially for salmonids.

I do have a major concern with reed canary grass, and that is post settlement alluvium. Natural flooding of wetlands normally results in large areas of pre-settlement alluvium that supports the native plant populations. When logging or leveling for farming and development occurred historically, post-settlement alluvium was deposited. Unlike pre-settlement alluvium the kind we have created has more topsoil and is a perfect seedbed for reed canary grass.

Reed canary grass is in a flood plain where wet pasture “thatch” can eventually get two feet deep or more. Often this means that the seed bed of native species has been blanketed by our activities. Native seed can and does stay alive (viable) for decades, just waiting for sun and fresh air. Two feet or more of thatch also means flood plain restorations are technically no longer wetlands, and salmonids need thousands of acres of wetlands for rearing, not just a few side channels and uplands.

If the focus is thatch removal to original wetland depths, planting and maintenance costs are offset and we are also restoring wetlands.

Jim Comrada

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...