After victory, Kitzhaber says no more PERS cuts

Oregon governor says it's time to address other concerns



SALEM, Ore. — Nearly a year after beginning a push to convince Oregon lawmakers to stem the growing costs of public-employee pensions, Gov. John Kitzhaber got his wish.

And now, he says, it’s time to move on. After lawmakers backed the pension cuts Wednesday, along with a series of other measures intended to boost support in the Legislature, Kitzhaber said further changes to the Public Employees Retirement System are “off the table for this governor.”

“We are done,” Kitzhaber told reporters. “We’re going to move on to other things that are important to Oregonians, put this behind us.”

Lawmakers approved the pension cuts as part of a five-bill package Wednesday, then adjourned a special session that consumed three tense days. On top of the pension measures, the agreement included changes to the tax code and a prohibition against local governments regulating genetically modified crops.

Kitzhaber, business leaders, education advocates and other supporters say the rising cost of pensions is contributing to large class sizes and shortened school years and making it difficult for local governments to reinvest in services that were cut during the Great Recession.

Retired government workers will see their pensions grow at a slower pace.

Beneficiaries in the Public Employee Retirement System and unions that represent government workers have vowed to challenge the cuts in court. Many of the lawmakers who voted for the PERS cuts said they didn’t want to take benefits from workers, but the system’s massive unfunded liabilities require action.

Together with cuts adopted earlier this year, the changes approved Wednesday would erase about a quarter of the system’s unfunded liabilities, which were created when investment losses erased 27 percent of the PERS fund in 2008.

Negotiations were necessary

Kitzhaber first proposed pension cuts in his budget released in December. Several attempts to marry them with a tax increase fell apart during the regular legislative session, which wrapped up in July.

The agreement just approved was negotiated last month by Kitzhaber and the top Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate. Democrats agreed to throw in the genetically modified foods bill when they were unable to meet Republican demands for steeper pension cuts or more generous tax cuts for small businesses.

Fearing a growing effort by environmental groups to seek local regulations on genetically modified foods, the agriculture industry has pushed for a statewide pre-emption. Farmers say it would be difficult and expensive to comply with a patchwork of local rules, but environmentalists and organic-food proponents say the state and federal governments have failed to adopt meaningful regulations.

Some said it’s unfair and potentially illegal to take retirement benefits promised to public employees. Others objected to tax breaks for businesses or to the inclusion of an agriculture measure in a package initially targeted at budget matters.