We aren’t exactly the retiring types in Washington, where “retirement” often means simply more time to climb mountains or catch salmon or train for marathons. But, on the other hand, we aren’t exactly Portland, the place where “young people go to retire.” Many of us actually will slow down at some point and think about our post-work careers, which makes the latest report by Bankrate somewhat relevant.
The consumer financial services company has released its annual ranking of the best — and worst — states for retirees. Bankrate pulled together studies from other organizations measuring things such as residents’ well-being, the cost of living, the state and local tax burden, and the quality of health care . . . and used them to determine how inviting each state is for retirees.
The verdict? Washington came in 22nd place, right between Georgia and Pennsylvania. Now, how we could rank behind a state that considers the 4,458-foot Blood Mountain to be a “mountain” is beyond us. And how we could barely rank ahead of a landlocked state is equally perplexing. The people doing the study obviously have never gotten a look at Mount Rainier or Puget Sound, but that’s probably beside the point. Oregon, by the way, came in 34th place, but there’s no word yet on whether they considered all those 25-year-old retirees for our neighbor to the south.
Washington scored fairly well in residents’ well-being and health care, and not so well in property crimes. For “possible sunshine,” it ranked 47th, which reinforces the notion that the weather here is a well-kept secret. Sure, it rains, but we’ll take that over the humidity or the blizzards or the hurricanes that plague other parts of the country.