<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Don’t draw conclusions yet

The Columbian
Published: May 17, 2014, 5:00pm

I read Lou Brancaccio’s May 10 column, “Oil should not define who we are.” Like Brancaccio, I agree that self-determination for any community is the right approach. Brancaccio cites the rise in oil train explosions. “Just don’t look too hard at all those news stories showing oil trains blowing up.” OK.

I did look hard and did the research on “exploding trains” in recent months. And while it is true that they are on the rise in the country as a whole, none would apply to the safety requirements that are planned for this terminal. Brancaccio didn’t mention the independent safety study that was done by TUV Rheinland Rail Science Inc. to make sure that safety is a first priority for this project. The study concluded that derailment, a major cause of exploding trains, was a “very low risk” for the Port of Vancouver.

I’m not convinced it’s a good idea yet and I have concerns, mostly about keeping the area clean, but I imagine a bustling economy, a steady revenue stream for this great city and folks employed, and hey, maybe a safe and clean port, too.

Keith Bloss

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...