<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Monday, March 18, 2024
March 18, 2024

Linkedin Pinterest

Singletary: Expectation versus the reality of retirement

By
Published:

Conversations with my friends have increasingly concerned when we plan to retire.

Some have done the math and figure they’ll have to work longer at their current jobs, hoping they can boost their retirement savings before health issues set in.

Yet studies show that what people expect regarding retirement doesn’t often match what really happens. To that point, the Employee Benefit Research Institute has just issued a report about the gap between expected and actual retirement. Coupled with a retirement confidence survey released earlier this year, EBRI is matching reality with expectation.

In the confidence survey, EBRI found that only 9 percent of workers said they planned to retire before age 60. But 35 percent of actual retirees reported they ended up leaving their jobs before 60. And 15 percent of workers reported that their expected retirement age had increased in the past year. Here are the reasons people cited for delaying retirement:

• Bad economy

• Inadequate finances or can’t afford to retire

• A change in employment situation

• Health care costs

• Lack of faith in Social Security or government

• Higher-than-expected cost of living

What’s most interesting about the latest EBRI report is the ability to examine the expected and actual retirement decisions for the same set of people. In looking at another set of data, from the University of Michigan’s Health and Retirement Study, EBRI found that 38 percent retired before they expected, 48 percent retired after they expected, and only 14 percent retired the year they thought they would.

Clearly many workers are overly optimistic about working longer than what the retiree experiences suggest, notes Sudipto Banerjee, EBRI research associate and author of the report.

In 2012, the expected probability of working full time after age 65 was 48.7 percent for men and 46 percent for women. But only 12.7 percent of men and 6 percent of women actually worked full time after age 65, the report found.

The findings showed that people without a defined contribution plan such as a 401(k) or a defined benefit plan such as a pension had larger differences between expected and actual retirement, compared with those who had such plans.

EBRI also found that prior to the onset of the financial crisis in September 2008, 83.9 percent of survey participants retired either earlier or no later than three years after their expected retirement date. But after the economic downturn, only 59.3 percent followed this pattern.

So how does this all relate to you?

Well, just look at the news from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., the federal agency that insures and protects the private-sector pension benefits of millions of Americans. In its annual report, the PBGC noted its overall deficit increased to about $62 billion.

The PBGC forecast a frightening picture for multi-employer plans, which saw a more than fivefold deficit increase to $42.4 billion. This was a record for the multi-employer program, which insures the benefits of more than 10 million workers and retirees in industries such as building and construction, retail, manufacturing, trucking and transportation.

In the PBGC’s single-employer program, the deficit has been reduced but still stands at $19.3 billion. That program insures the pensions of about 31 million workers and retirees in about 22,300 plans sponsored by private-sector employers.

Retirement can be a moving target with so many variables, some of which are out of your control. But when things change, often the most you can do is adjust your expectations.


Michelle Singletary welcomes comments and column ideas.

Loading...