<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Saturday,  June 15 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
 

Letter: Parties siphon millions for primary

The Columbian
Published: August 2, 2015, 5:00pm

At the risk of sounding too pedantic, something in Greg Jayne’s July 26 essay, “Parties cling to antiquated way of choosing candidates,” about our primaries is sadly overlooked — Democrats and Republicans are not branches of government; they are member-based, competing organizations that offer candidates for election. Unlike businesses, large and small, that have to pay for market research, the two parties have manipulated taxpayers into funding that research in the form of primary elections. In Washington state, as Jayne mentioned, that amounts to $11.5 million.

If an example of “effective” bipartisanship were ever needed, taxpayer-funded primaries would well suffice.

Perhaps our local business owners should petition state government for funds to evaluate their own promotions. That would cost a lot, and would probably meet a resounding bipartisan response.

Mike Kleiner

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...