<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Business

Starbucks CEO defends campaign on race

Critics blast it for being naive, opportunistic

The Columbian
Published: March 18, 2015, 12:00am

NEW YORK — Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz on Wednesday defended the company’s new “Race Together” campaign that has been criticized for being naive and even using racial tensions to boost the company’s bottom line.

The push by the chain best known for its Frappuccinos entails having its U.S. workers write “Race Together” on cups. Starbucks also plans to start publishing “conversation guides” on the topic, with questions like “How have your racial views evolved from those of your parents?”

During its annual meeting in Seattle, Schultz said the company is trying to use its massive reach for good: “Some in the media will criticize Starbucks for having a political agenda. Our intentions are pure.”

The campaign is the latest example of a big company trying to tie its brands to big social issues. The move comes as consumer brands acknowledge that customers are increasingly drawn to companies that project a feel-good image or embrace social causes.

But it also illustrates how such efforts can fall flat if people don’t see a clear correlation between the social cause and the company’s products. After it was announced early this week, the Starbucks’ campaign was widely ridiculed on social media by people who said it’s opportunistic and inappropriate for a coffee chain to insert itself into such an important issue. Others questioned whether Starbucks executives think the chain’s workers could spark productive conversations about race relations while serving lattes.

An executive on Starbucks’ communications team, Corey duBrowa, even blocked people on Twitter before temporarily taking down his account. DuBrowa later said in a post on Medium that he felt he was being “personally attacked in a cascade of negativity” and that he had gotten overwhelmed.

At its annual meeting, Schultz said he didn’t think Starbucks would solve the country’s “centuries old problems of racism” but that he thinks it can make a difference. He said workers don’t have to participate, and that stores will make customers another drink or cover up cups if they don’t like the message. “This is not a marketing or PR exercise,” Schultz said.

Laura Ries, a branding consultant based in Atlanta, said that addressing big, important issues of the day has become a way for companies to make themselves a part of the conversation. Otherwise, nobody is sitting around on Twitter discussing brands, she said.

“There’s nothing wrong with talking about race relations,” Ries said. “But is it something people naturally associate with Starbucks? It’s not.”

Loading...