<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Oil terminal proposal stinks

By Bob Low, VANCOUVER
Published: May 23, 2017, 6:00am

I finished a report to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council in response to the air permit for the Vancouver oil terminal. One aspect is that the tank farm design isn’t close to best available control technology. They aren’t installing pollution control equipment on the storage tank vents, simply to save money.

This has direct bearing on the health of the Port of Vancouver staff at the port offices. My analysis shows the concentration of benzene in the air there will be well over 16 times the legal limit in light summer breeze, and just above the legal limit in a 20 mph wind. Benzene causes cancer and many other illnesses.

It will be unsafe for the staff to be in their offices all summer long — not to mention how much it will stink like crude.

Tesoro estimates the “incremental ambient impact” for benzene at 67 percent of the legal limit, so even they say they will just barely squeeze under the legal wire on an annual basis. The port staff are being duped.

They don’t have to inflict these toxic fumes on anyone, but they choose to do it to save money. It stinks. Just say “no.”

See you at the air permit hearing on June 7.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...