Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Laird wrong about bridge

The Columbian
Published: May 26, 2012, 5:00pm

In his May 20 column, “Yes, CRC costs are high, but don’t ignore the benefits,” John Laird did some excellent hand-waving in his attempt to cost justify the Columbia River Crossing. Fact is, it won’t solve the congestion problem; it will simply encourage Vancouver sprawl and immediately back up congestion to the Interstate 5-Interstate 84 interchange. Better to extend the life of the I-5 Bridge, implement tolls and let Vancouver taxpayers build a cheaper dedicated MAX line from the Expo Center to Vancouver. Washington and Oregon could better use the rest of the money to reduce post-secondary school tuition costs and rebuild the dilapidated K-12 schools that are known earthquake threats to tens of thousands of children.

Dennis Phillips

Portland

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...