Thursday,  December 12 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Defend institution of marriage

The Columbian
Published: October 28, 2012, 5:00pm

As a concerned 18-year-old and first-time voter, I am saddened by the direction our state is headed. This election has a crucial issue on the ballot: marriage — an institution and commitment designed for one man and one woman. Traditional marriage was instituted long ago because it is the only relationship in which procreation naturally happens. I wouldn’t be here if it were not for my mom and dad. I am truly thankful to have both: I glean and benefit from each one in a special way.

Marriage needs to stay defined as one man and one woman. Anything other than this is not marriage. Join with me in defending life, prosperity, and the well-being of our state and nation by rejecting Referendum 74.

Karissa Sears

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...