NEW YORK — Some chocolate chip cookie questions are easy. Should you put nuts in your chocolate chip cookies? No, obviously. Should your chocolate chip cookies be chewy or crunchy? Chewy, duh.
Others are more difficult. Should you stick with the classic recipe, the one that Ruth Wakefield invented at the Toll House Inn in 1938 and that has adorned packages of Nestle chocolate chips for decades? Or should you choose a newfangled, sophisticated, scientifically refined recipe, like the one The New York Times published in 2008? (The ingredients list for the Times recipe, based on French pastry chef Jacque Torres’ version, begins, “2 cups minus 2 tablespoons (8 1/2 ounces) cake flour, 12/3 cups (8 1/2 ounces) bread flour … .” 1-2-3-4 cake this is not.
I have a hard time answering this question. There’s something about the proposition of finding the “perfect” chocolate chip cookie via cold, calculating clinical trials that smacks of hubris. Surely tradition counts for something. (And surely people should not have to get out their digital scales every time they want to make cookies.) I am also wary of French chefs who think they understand chocolate chip cookies better than Americans do.
Then again, tastes change over time, and some developments — like the idea of sprinkling sea salt over your cookies before baking them — are undeniably very good. (The combination of chocolate and sea salt is far superior to the more traditional combination of caramel and sea salt.)