U.S. Chamber: EPA rules could cost economy $51B a year

WASHINGTON — Signaling growing industry opposition to the Obama administration’s forthcoming proposal to curb carbon emissions from power plants, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce issued a report Wednesday warning the climate change rule could cost the economy tens of billions of dollars in lost investment and millions of jobs.

The Environmental Protection Agency is expected next Monday to unveil regulations that would push states to make significant cuts in pollution from coal generators, which account for about 40 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions in the country.

Although the exact size of the proposed reduction has yet to be announced, the chamber’s report estimated that such a rule could result, on average, a drop of $51 billion in economic output a year and 224,000 fewer jobs every year through 2030, with the Southeast feeling the biggest pinch.

The chamber said the numbers were based on modeling from the economic research firm IHS using assumptions that the regulation would set a 42 percent reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions by 2030 from 2005 levels — an aggressive percentage that is close to a target previously cited by President Barack Obama.

Some analysts noted, however, that the chamber’s economic analysis doesn’t take into account the gains in productivity, among other benefits in employing pollution-cutting technologies and shifting to cleaner sources of energy.

Even if the chamber’s projections are true, some economists said, a $51 billion drop in output amounts to peanuts for an American economy with an annual gross domestic product of about $15 trillion.

“It sounds ominous, but it’s tiny,” said Stephen Levy, director of the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy in Palo Alto, Calif. Of the estimated hit to jobs, he said: “We added 288,000 jobs last month alone.”