Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Scrutinize NuStar’s application

The Columbian
Published: January 8, 2015, 4:00pm

I’m asking the city of Vancouver to determine “significance” for the NuStar Energy oil storage terminal, and require the SEPA and EIS process. The change of the NuStar operation to crude oil is significant and deserves additional determination. This facility is closer to downtown and Hough Elementary School than the proposed Tesoro-Savage project. There are many legal reasons to require additional determination; two in particular have caught my attention:

  1. The facility is being designed to handle six times the throughput than as specified in NuStar’s submittals to Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council and Southwest Clean Air Agency.

  2. Allowed emissions will be different. Benzene would increase by 72 pounds per year, with the emission limit set at 82.6 pounds. And a project change for pollutant SO2 is 0.17 tons per year, with the emission limit set at 0.24 tons per year (Southwest Clean Air Agency air discharge permit).

As a community, we have been working hard to “revitalize” downtown Vancouver. We have made great strides toward this and we now stand on the cusp of waterfront revitalization. Will people want to move into our area with increased benzene and SO2 emissions? Non-stop rail traffic? The threat of oil spills and combustion?

We are giving the future of Vancouver away for a handful of jobs and a few dollars in tax revenue, which is eclipsed by the taxes (and quality of life) we stand to gain from revitalization. Approving oil terminals up and down our shoreline is a big step in the opposite direction.

We must scrutinize every possible aspect of this project and ensure that it is within all regulatory standards, without exception. The stakes are too high to allow these changes to our community to go unquestioned.

David Lafayette

Vancouver

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...