Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Jayne: Time to think outside the box about racial heritage

By Greg Jayne, Columbian Opinion Page Editor
Published: June 14, 2015, 12:00am

Was Babe Ruth black?

A lot of people think the most celebrated player in baseball history had some black ancestry, given his facial features and dark complexion. Many opponents during his career — Ruth played in the all-white major leagues long before they were integrated — would taunt him with racial slurs, and historians have inconclusively examined the question of Ruth’s heritage. There is, indeed, some gallows humor in thinking that baseball’s owners considered their game to be lily-white while Ruth was making a mockery of it.

Is Tiger Woods African-American?

Woods, the most celebrated golfer of his generation, universally is regarded as black and as a groundbreaking symbol for his race in a traditionally exclusive sport. Yet his mother is a native of Thailand, making him at least half-Asian.

And therein lies the problem. When it comes to race, we are bound and determined to wedge individuals and their millennia of family history into little boxes. Fill out the form and check the box that says either “Caucasian” or “black” or “American Indian” or “Hispanic,” regardless of the fact that reality is far too complex to be so easily defined.

Anyway, I thought about all of this the other day as the story of Rachel Dolezal became national news. Dolezal, 37, is president of the NAACP chapter in Spokane and apparently has become a well-known civil rights activist in Eastern Washington. Her parents, who live in Montana, did a TV interview last week in which her mother, Ruthanne Dolezal, said, “She chose to represent herself as an African-American woman or a biracial person, and that’s simply not true. … She’s our birth daughter, and we’re both of European descent.” Ruthanne Dolezal added that her daughter began to portray herself as African-American eight or nine years ago, after the family adopted four black children.

All of which generated enough titillation to have Twitter and the media all aflutter. When the CNN headline reads, “Parents out NAACP leader as white woman,” then discussion of race in this country has sunk to a new level of bizarreness.

Which brings us to the most pertinent questions: Does it matter? Should racial identity be self-determined? And why do we ask about racial identity on various forms and applications?

In Dolezal’s situation, it matters because she apparently lied and identified herself as white, black, and American Indian when applying for Spokane’s Office of Police Ombudsman Commission, for which she serves as chairwoman. She also, presumably, led administrators at Eastern Washington University — where she teaches in the Africana Studies Program — to believe that she is black. And it matters because she has filed many complaints with police over the years about racial harassment and threats, all of which are now called into question.

The lie is the problem

As so often happens, the lie is more troublesome than the reality, creating a labyrinth from which the perpetrator cannot escape — until it crashes down upon itself.

For her part, Dolezal responded to an inquiry from The (Spokane) Spokesman-Review by saying, “The question is not as easy as it seems. There’s a lot of complexities … and I don’t know that everyone would understand that.” All of which might set a new high on the self-absorbed and arrogant scales. Dolezal comes across as an unrepentant charlatan using racial politics for personal gain — and setting those politics back in the process.

Yet, as author Rob Neyer wrote years ago while discussing the Babe Ruth question for ESPN.com: “Race categorization has nothing to do with precision, and everything to do with politics. … Will we acknowledge the fact that a person’s heritage can’t be squeezed into a little box next to ‘black’ or ‘white’? I hope so. But our history in this area is not exactly encouraging.”

Which brings us back to our original premise: Was Babe Ruth black? Is Tiger Woods black? And when will it stop mattering?

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...