Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Columns

Camden: Pressing questions on legislative session answered

By Jim Camden
Published: June 17, 2015, 12:00am

Sunday marked Day 150 of the legislative session. A deal on the 2015-17 operating budget had yet to emerge and the only thing anyone could say for sure is the 2015 session can’t go for more than another 200 days. Because after that it will be 2016.

OK, not that funny, but it passes for humor in Olympia, where legislative leaders meet behind closed doors with each other, the governor, and a few people with intimate knowledge of the way the state raises and spends money. Reporters have been trying to divine tidbits of information about the progress of budget talks from monosyllabic answers legislators give to questions going in or out of negotiations, or the fact that they don’t answer, or their facial expressions, or the fact that they duck out a back door of the conference room so we can’t see their facial expressions. But to convince the editors that we are not spending these nice summer days paddling a kayak around the South Puget Sound, we offer some answers to common questions about the budget discussions as they stand.

Why do you keep writing about “the budget”? Aren’t there several budgets?

That’s correct. The state’s transportation budget, which uses gasoline taxes and other revenue connected to motor vehicles and transportation for roads, bridges and mass transit, has already passed. There’s also a capital budget, which it uses for large and small building projects, and a second transportation budget that could be used for new projects if a new gasoline tax is passed. The operating budget, sometimes called the general fund, which pays for most of the other programs, projects, and state salaries and benefits, is the biggest and the focus of all the negotiations.

How big is it?

In February and May, economists said the recovery was going so well that there would be more revenue, and the current figure is about $36.6 billion. Both sides want to do good things with that money, although not necessarily the same good things. Senate Republicans have a budget with about $37.9 billion in spending, and House Democrats have one that’s about $38.4 billion.

That’s more than they’ve got. Where would they get the extra money?

Senate Republicans move some money out of other funds that are set aside for certain things like capital projects, liquor taxes and the state’s newest tax source, marijuana. Democrats complain, but moving money like this is a standard Olympia budget tactic to fill a gap, and both parties have done it in the past.

House Democrats have proposed some tax increases or new taxes to cover the gap. Senate Republicans say they will not support new taxes and have said they won’t discuss the higher spending level unless the House passes the taxes to cover the difference. House Democrats say they have the votes to pass their taxes, but insist there’s no point as long as the Senate Republicans say they won’t pass them. Supporting new taxes would be a problem for some candidates in 2016.

So are the 2016 elections the biggest worry for legislators seeking a budget deal?

No. For many of them the biggest worry is housing.

Like the high cost of housing in Seattle or foreclosures in some depressed counties?

No, their housing. Most legislators returned home to wait for a budget deal, and their local apartment leases ended with the regular session in April. They worry about where they’ll stay this week if a deal is struck and they have to return to the capital, where all available lodging has been booked for the U.S. Open at nearby Chambers Bay. There’s talk of pitching tents on the Capitol grounds, or rolling out sleeping bags on the granite floors of the Rotunda, like the Occupy protesters did for several nights in 2011.

That sounds pretty rough. Isn’t there anyplace else they could stay?

They might get temporary digs in a local university dorm, which could lead to a movie script.

“House of Cards, Olympia Edition”?

Or “Animal House 2 — the Geezer Version.”

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...