At a hearing on Oct. 13, the commissioners at the Port of Vancouver heard many reasons to say “no” to the proposed oil terminal. During a public comment period, concerned residents spoke again about the dangers and risks involved with oil-by-rail coming through the Columbia River Gorge and into Vancouver.
The commissioners can still say “no” to the oil terminal, while also saying “yes” to many positive alternatives, such as safer neighborhoods, cleaner air, jobs at the new waterfront development site, a healthier living environment, protection of world-class waterfalls in the Gorge, and an opportunity to lead the way nationally as a supporter of renewable energy. Soon voters will also have an opportunity to say “yes” to these positives while saying “no” to the oil terminal.
After attending the hearing at the port, I walked through the nearby Vancouver Lake park. Someone earlier had made a heart of red-colored fall leaves, placing them very visibly on the green grass: a silent reminder of the beauty that is worth protecting in the community we call home.
