Sunday, December 5, 2021
Dec. 5, 2021

Linkedin Pinterest

Bills would standardize state wage, leave laws

Four-year phase-in is offered as compromise


OLYMPIA — The Washington Legislature should standardize the state’s minimum wage and sick leave laws to avoid a growing number of workplace standards, business representatives told a Senate panel Monday. But they didn’t agree on the best way to do it.

Labor and union officials, meanwhile, criticized a plan to raise the minimum wage to $12 an hour over four years and to phase in minimum sick leave in 2018 as “too little, too late.”

Washington has five different sets of minimum wage standards and four different paid sick leave requirements, including one approved last week in Spokane over a mayoral veto.

The Senate Commerce and Labor Committee considered bills standardize both.

Sen. Steve Hobbs, D-Lake Stevens, offered a plan to raise the minimum wage each year from the current $9.47 to $12 an hour by 2021 and to phase in paid sick and family leave starting at three days per year in 2018. Hobbs said it has things neither party will like but both could work with.

“We have to do something; otherwise, an initiative will be forced on us,” he said.

Holly Chisa of the Northwest Grocery Association supports Hobbs’ bill, saying companies might have employees who work in different cities with different wage standards.

But Mark Johnson of the Washington Retail Association opposed Hobbs’ bill and urged the panel to steer clear of any increase in the minimum wage. His members support “a free-market economy,” and any increase would artificially inflate starting wages, he said.

To limit cities’ power

Another proposal, by committee chairman Mike Baumgartner, R-Spokane, would bar cities from increasing the minimum wage or requiring paid sick leave. That could be done only by the state or a county.

Spokane City Councilwoman Candace Mumm traveled to Olympia to defend the council’s recent decision on family and medical leave, but time ran out before she could testify. If she’d had a chance, she would have urged the panel not to repeal a city’s ability to care for the health of its residents, she said.

“We had to step up because the state hasn’t,” Mumm said.