Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Life

Study tepid on touch typing

People who develop own style are just as fast

By Fred Barbash, The Washington Post
Published: February 19, 2016, 6:10am

Your parents made you take touch typing, maybe even in summer school. The teacher was humorless. The exercises inane. You had no plans to compete in the Ultimate Typing Championship or become a professional typist. But The Big Brown Bear and the Quick Brown Fox would pay off some day you were told. But when the day came, when you grew up and arrived in your first office, and you saw that the person next to you was typing just as fast or faster with two fingers or four instead of 10, you knew that summer was lost, never to be regained

Now, too late for you, but not too late for your kids, comes scientific proof that ordinary people (as opposed to those conditioned to break the 120 wpm barrier) who are touch typists are no faster or more accurate than those who have over time developed their own typing strategies.

And it doesn’t matter whether you use 10 fingers or five or six while you’re typing. The result, on average, will be the same.

That’s the finding of a study by researchers at Finland’s Aalto University.

The researchers studied the typing habits of 30 people, using an optical motion capture system to record their exact finger movements, so in addition to studying speed, they could discern the different ways typists used their hands.

Some used one or two fingers of each hand. Some used four or five. Gamers had particular quirky habits, which they transferred to typing, like always using their left thumb on the space bar, a habit increasingly ingrained with the advent of the mouse, generally gripped with the right hand.

Regardless, for each group, they found that some typed slowly and some fast, up to 79 words per minute regardless of whether they used the touch method or, over time, had developed their own strategies in their own ways.

Self-taught, non-touch typists did tend to look down at the keyboard more instead of the screen, which had a tendency to slow some down, co-author Anna Feit said in an interview.

But overall, there was no difference within the group studied in speed and accuracy between the methods.

Big caveat for kids: If you don’t type your own papers and instead nag your mom or dad or some friend to do it for you, you will never develop your own way of typing, your own system, and you will suffer, no matter. Gaming doesn’t count as typing.

So is learning touch typing a waste of time and money? “I think the touch typing system is great if you really want to invest the time and effort,” Feit said.

“If your goal is to type 100 words per minute or 120 words per minute, I would definitely recommend learning a touch typing system. . . .But if you’re just a regular office typist who writes email and reports, I think there are better ways to train yourself using your own system but paying attention to other factors. Keep your hands more static. Don’t move your hands toward the key.”

Because what does matter, the researchers found, is not whether you took a touch typing course, but whether you move your hands around as you type.

“Fast typists have learned to keep their hands fixed on one position, instead of moving them over the keyboard, and more consistently use the same finger to type a certain letter.”

That’s the secret, she said.

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...