Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Impact greater than advised

By Rick Schmitt, Vancouver
Published: January 3, 2016, 5:59am

I am a 48-year resident of Vancouver who is very concerned about the long-term impact of an oil export terminal at the Port Vancouver.

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement does not consider two major problems with an oil export terminal there. If an oil terminal is built at the Port of Vancouver, an estimated 360,000 barrels of highly flammable crude oil per day will travel through our region. The increased flow of oil trains will cause a high likelihood of an oil disaster due to human or mechanical error. An oil disaster also is not an incident that emergency responders are prepared to fight.

That said, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee should stop the proposed construction of an oil terminal at the Port of Vancouver.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...