<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Editorials

In Our View: Food Sites, Pets Don’t Mix

Only certified service animals OK in restaurants, groceries; keep others home

The Columbian
Published: November 16, 2017, 6:03am

Allow us to begin by debunking a common superstition: No, a dog’s mouth does not have fewer germs than a human’s, despite many believing that to be true. As the American Kennel Club writes: “Most of us have just accepted this as fact, when we think about it at all, but have you ever wondered if it is actually true? Here’s a hint: the answer is no.”

The fact is that dogs carry plenty of germs, not to mention an occasional flea or tick, so there are good reasons they are largely prohibited from entering restaurants and grocery stores. With businesses placed in a difficult spot regarding the presence of animals, the burden must fall upon patrons to understand and follow the law. In other words, your pet probably has no business joining you for a cup of cappuccino.

Under state law, only certified service animals — such as dogs guiding a blind person — are allowed in businesses where food is served or sold. Under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, only a dog or a miniature horse that is specially trained can qualify as a service animal. The presence of unqualified animals — regardless of how adorable they might be — could put a business at risk for sanctions under Washington’s health code.

This might sound surprising, considering a growing trend that has pet owners bringing all manner of animals into stores and restaurants. In 2012, Clark County Public Health fielded three complaints about animals in food service establishments; through Oct. 28, the agency had received 18 such complaints this year. “It probably is viewed by some as an innocent thing, but the reality is it puts the business in a precarious legal place,” Joe Laxson, program manager for Clark County environmental public health, told The Columbian.

It also places businesses in a precarious place regarding customer service. Legally, employees can ask two questions regarding an animal: Is it required as a result of a disability? And what task has the animal been trained to perform? But businesses are understandably reluctant to query about pets and an owners’ disability.

Rather than interrogate owners, many businesses err on the side of caution and allow the situation to go unchallenged. Consider it the path of least resistance. “Many business owners don’t know what questions to ask, and they’re afraid they’re going to get a lawsuit, so they let anyone with an animal come in,” said Michael Richardson, director of the Northwest ADA Center.

This is unfair to businesses and to other patrons who might be uncomfortable around certain animals or might be allergic to them. Therefore, the impetus must be upon pet owners to follow the law.

Anybody who frequents public places is well aware of this issue. The prevalence of pets is increasingly apparent, likely the result of owners noticing other animals in the local coffee shop and then deciding that it must be OK to bring their own the next time around. Knowingly or not, those owners are violating the health code unless their companion is a service animal.

Oh, it’s not that dogs — or cats, monkeys, iguanas or other domesticated animals — are a walking bundle of germs that are dangerous to humans. It’s just that restaurants work hard to maintain antiseptic food service without facing the additional burden of having animals present. And it’s just that stores are designed for people, not pets.

Leaving your pet at home is simply a matter of courtesy for both proprietors and other patrons.

Loading...