<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 18 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Columns

Donnelly: Federal forests need new approach

By Ann Donnelly
Published: October 8, 2017, 6:01am

‘Angel’s Rest is toast,” was the grim report from a pilot flying above the wildfire-scorched Columbia River Gorge on Sept. 24. The Eagle Creek fire brought its sad impacts — incinerated wildlife and destroyed businesses — closer to Southwest Washington residents than at any time in recent memory. The experience leaves residents here searching for answers.

Our 2017 fire season was not the first recent catastrophe; 2014 and 2015 yielded some of the largest wildfires in the history of Washington state, burning about 1.4 million acres. Hot, dry conditions sparked by lightning and human stupidity start fires but do not account for the recent longer fire seasons and larger burned acreage.

Climate change, a nebulous factor, does not explain why the majority of the fires, now burning hotter and over wider acreage, is concentrated on federal land, as compared to private or state lands. The Oregon State Forester reports that of 672,500 acres burned in Oregon, 94 percent are on federal lands, though state and federal lands are roughly the same acreage. On private lands such as Weyerhaeuser’s, fires are more efficiently managed on stands of trees of varying ages and heights.

Due to annual budget cuts and environmental lawsuits over the past three decades, federal forests have been managed as preserves rather than as active multiuse forests producing the region’s renewable timber supply. The result of diminished harvests has been to produce a thick, uniform forest canopy ideally suited for large, hot fires that destroy the soil, seeds and spores needed to regenerate. Tragically, observations at Washington’s Carlton Complex Fire area conclude that the forest is not regenerating, and may never recover.

It started with owl

The decline of federal timber harvests dates to 1990, when the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service listed the Northern spotted owl as threatened.

Harvesting of trees on federal acreage fell precipitously as proposed logging was, and still is, consistently challenged in court by environmental activists. In the Sept. 27 Wall Street Journal, Christopher Brong, former Skamania County commissioner, observed “federal laws provide a rich litigation atmosphere exploited by environmental organization lawyers.”

The pinching-off of timber harvests cut off a supply of money from the private sector that once flowed to the Forest Service to manage forests and fight fires.

Meanwhile, the share of Forest Service budget needed for firefighting is rising steeply, from 16 percent in 1995 to a projected unsustainable 67 percent by 2021.

Sadly, federal timber harvests denied to loggers and rural communities are being consumed needlessly in fire catastrophes. Despite thousands of workers displaced from woods and mills, the spotted owl is declining, and in massive fires, is cruelly reduced to ashes along with every other species of wildlife.

It is time to rethink a system that holds up beneficial and profitable harvests in endless litigation.

Brong wrote, “Until Congress develops the political courage to act on public-land reforms, our forested lands will continue to be incinerated.”

U.S. Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., pins the blame on the Senate “blocking our bipartisan legislation that has passed overwhelmingly in the House year after year.” If Sens. Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell want to prevent a recurrence of the Carlton and Eagle Creek fires, they will support the House’s bipartisan approach.

Loading...