Wednesday,  December 11 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Health / Health Wire

Skip the sexy headlines and stick to balanced diet

Study re-enforces moderation best for healthful eating

By Carrie Dennett, Special to The Washington Post
Published: October 9, 2017, 6:05am

When it comes to nutrition, moderation simply isn’t sexy. What grabs our attention and our clicks are headlines such as “The poison lurking in your kitchen,” as if we’re one bite away from death, and “Why you must eat this exotic superfood,” as if we’re one bite away from a miracle.

Unfortunately, these alluring-but-false promises distract us from a more moderate, and ultimately more successful, path to better health. A balanced eating plan that offers both nutrition and pleasure can help you be your best while actually allowing you to enjoy your food — no extremism required. What’s sexier — or saner — than that?

It was interesting to see the reaction to the September publication of two research papers that reinforced the wisdom of moderation. The PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) study looked at the habits and health of 135,000 people in 18 countries on five continents. Researchers found that the healthiest individuals ate diets rich in fruits, vegetables and beans, while being low in refined carbohydrates and sugar. Other than the somewhat surprising finding that the health benefits of vegetables topped out at three to four servings per day, all of this is in line with a moderate diet as defined by the U.S. Dietary Guidelines.

Headlines about the research painted a different picture, stating that the study “casts doubt” on the conventional wisdom about fats, carbs, fruits and vegetables and that it was “shaking up” the field of nutrition. Even the accompanying commentary that ran in the Lancet, the journal that published the findings, said “PURE study challenges the definition of a healthy diet.”

Trouble is, when you look at the current definition of a healthy diet, it pretty much matches the PURE findings. The researchers did find that high-carbohydrate diets were associated with a 28 percent higher risk of dying during the study. But we’re talking 77 percent carbs, which has never been part of the definition of a healthy diet, in part because it leaves little room for adequate protein and healthy fats. Speaking of fat, the PURE results suggest that total fat intake of about 35 percent of calories isn’t associated with risk of heart attack or death due to cardiovascular disease, but expert consensus for many years has been that low-fat diets aren’t the way to go.

So, other than the lure of new and shiny promises, what keeps us from the path of moderation? These are some common obstacles:

• Having no idea what you’re really eating: Unless you are mindful and aware of what and how much you are eating — and many people aren’t — it’s easy to think you’re eating moderately when you’re not. For example, you may say, “I have dessert only a few nights a week,” but forget that you grab a cookie, every time someone brings a box into work. Keeping a food journal for a few weeks to gain an objective look at your eating patterns can be illuminating.

• Not planning for the long journey: Start thinking of nutrition and health as a lifelong journey — with occasional detours and temporary roadblocks — rather than a race to the finish line.

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...