Thursday,  December 12 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
Opinion
The following is presented as part of The Columbian’s Opinion content, which offers a point of view in order to provoke thought and debate of civic issues. Opinions represent the viewpoint of the author. Unsigned editorials represent the consensus opinion of The Columbian’s editorial board, which operates independently of the news department.
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Argument doesn’t pass muster

By Adam Jackson, Vancouver
Published: February 25, 2018, 6:00am

I have noticed in Our Readers’ Views (“Need for gun control clear,” Feb. 16) and in various social media the argument that when our forefathers adopted the Second Amendment, the weapon of the day was the flintlock musket, hence if law-abiding citizens wish to carry arms today they should be restricted to flintlock muskets.

How ridiculous! First of all, the founders did not design the Constitution to be an ephemeral document that would lose its applicability over time. Secondly, at the time the Second Amendment was adopted, the flintlock musket was the most advanced weapon available, ergo the most advanced weapons of today should be available to law-abiding citizens who meet federal standards for purchasing arms.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter

Support local journalism

Your tax-deductible donation to The Columbian’s Community Funded Journalism program will contribute to better local reporting on key issues, including homelessness, housing, transportation and the environment. Reporters will focus on narrative, investigative and data-driven storytelling.

Local journalism needs your help. It’s an essential part of a healthy community and a healthy democracy.

Community Funded Journalism logo
Loading...