BALTIMORE — Baltimore police detectives are trying to figure out whether a chaotic shooting attack on a crowd enjoying a weekend cookout might be competition between underworld groups, a triggerman seeking vengeance or another kind of senseless strike.
But one thing’s for certain: In a city accustomed to gun violence, the Sunday afternoon shooting that killed one and wounded seven others in a gritty West Baltimore neighborhood barely stands out in a sea of similar shootings.
“I think this weekend’s shooting unfortunately exemplifies the kind of standard violence, quote-unquote, we’re seeing in Baltimore,” said Cassandra Crifasi, deputy director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at Baltimore’s Johns Hopkins University.
And with no arrests a day after the bloodshed at the crowded cookouts, police investigators might again be struggling to overcome Baltimore’s strong anti-informant culture that chronically makes eyewitnesses to shootings and other crimes too afraid or simply unwilling to come forward.
“It is only with community help that we will be able to identify who did this and hold them accountable,” said Police Commissioner Michael Harrison, who said the shooting appeared to be “extremely targeted.”
Acting Mayor Bernard “Jack” Young also urged witnesses to share what they know.
“Someone knows something,” he said. “These things … they don’t happen by happenstance. People know who’s doing these shootings.”
Although the motive for the weekend attack is not clear, there has long been an escalating arms race among Baltimore’s criminal gangs that has turned some neighborhoods into battle zones, particularly in the most deeply disenfranchised areas.
Street crews dramatically drive up the rates of violent crime by introducing illegal firearms and narcotics with a street value greatly exceeding the size of the surrounding neighborhood’s legal economy.
The corrosive impact of the drug trade and a recurrence of tit-for-tat turf wars and retaliatory attacks have gotten so bad that researchers say they’ve seen a change in social norms about what is an acceptable way to resolve disputes.
“It’s not going to the police. It seems to be taking things into their own hands and committing a form of violence in return,” Crifasi said in a Monday phone interview.
Jeffrey Ian Ross, a criminologist at the University of Baltimore, agreed, arguing that it’s highly possible that people at the cookout actually know who committed the violence and “they are going to handle this matter on their own,” ignoring local police altogether.
“Trust in police is, perhaps, near an all-time low,” he said.
‘No snitching’ culture
Ross added there’s no indication that Baltimore’s entrenched “no snitching” culture has eased in recent years, particularly amid recurrent city leadership vacuums and any number of serious problems with the city’s police force, which is under federal oversight for unconstitutional and discriminatory policing.
Baltimore authorities routinely appeal to the public for information to improve its closure rate for homicides and other violent crimes. In recent months, the city’s top prosecutor, Marilyn Mosby, has even started a TV, radio and billboard campaign intended to encourage witnesses to come forward. She says some one third of criminal cases dropped by prosecutors are impacted by witnesses and victims who avoid court.
Witness intimidation has long plagued Baltimore’s criminal justice system. Some point to appalling cases where witnesses were killed, including a family in a 2002 arson after complaining about local drug dealing. And many locals well remember a popular street DVD called “Stop Snitching” that featured drug dealers warning residents they could “get a hole in their head” for cooperating with authorities.
Whether police might be able to overcome a fear of retribution in this investigation or if a retaliatory attack is in the offing is not yet clear.
