<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Thursday,  April 25 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Business

Boeing’s $100 million pledge sparks criticism

Lawyers for families worry it could influence probes

By Dominic Gates and Steve Miletich, The Seattle Times
Published: July 4, 2019, 4:45pm

Boeing announced a $100 million fund Wednesday as an “initial outreach” to the families of victims of the two 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia, a step that lawyers for the families called “unprecedented” yet dismissed as little more than a publicity ploy.

Because the money will be disbursed partly to local authorities and communities, families and lawyers expressed fear that some of it will line the pockets of local officials and could even exert Boeing influence on the handling of the investigations by the Indonesian and Ethiopian authorities.

Boeing said Wednesday it will provide the money “over multiple years … to address family and community needs of those affected by the tragic accidents of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302.”

The company said the money is intended to “support education, hardship and living expenses for impacted families, community programs and economic development in impacted communities.”

The donation comes as scores of lawsuits are pending after the two crashes that killed a total of 346 passengers and crew. Boeing spokesman Chaz Bickers said the money is being given independent of the lawsuits, and that none of the victims’ families will have to waive any rights in accepting it.

Boeing said it will work with local governments and nonprofit organizations to deploy the money, over a period of years.

Lawyers from the victims’ families reacted negatively Wednesday. Steven Marks, of the Miami law firm Podhurst Orseck, who represents more than 30 families of victims in both crashes, called it “nothing more than a public-relations stunt to appease the general public.”

Jeff Feldman, a professor at the University of Washington School of Law, said such advance payments are “not uncommon in mass tort or mass casualty cases.”

“When the Exxon Valdez went aground in Alaska, Exxon made substantial pre-litigation payments to various parties (e.g., fishermen, communities affected by the spill),” Feldman said via email. “I believe that BP did the same thing following the Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Mark Dombroff, an Alexandria, Va.-based aviation lawyer with LeClairRyan, said that after most airline accidents, “the airline sends a check to the family, without asking for releases or a credit against any future settlement,” to handle immediate needs such as mortgage or school tuition.

However, there appears to be no precedent with airplane crashes for a large global payout such as Boeing has promised. Marks said such a payment in advance of any legal settlement is “incredibly unusual” and that he’s never seen such a donation in his 35-year career representing victims in major aircraft crashes across the world.

Likewise, Robert Clifford, who has brought lawsuits in the Ethiopian crash on behalf of 23 families from 18 countries, among them eight U.S. families, called Boeing’s payment “unprecedented.”

Clifford nonetheless called the payment “disingenuous” and said it’s “not going over very well with the families that I have spoken with.”

He said the families are “tired of hearing justice and accountability defined only in terms of compensation.” He said they want answers about what happened and help in recovering the human remains from the crash site.

Shantel Rehhorn, sister of Canadian victim Angela Rehhorn, issued a statement Wednesday calling Boeing’s offer “a slap in the face to all who have lost loved ones.”

“I believe this is just their way of trying to win back customers,” said Rehhorn.

Marks expressed particular concern that some of the Boeing money will be funneled through the governments in Indonesia and Ethiopia, which he said is “a serious problem” because the local authorities in those countries take the lead in the accident investigations.

“It’s aimed at influencing those in charge of the investigations, hoping they may not push as hard as they should in uncovering all the facts,” said Marks. “Boeing realizes it has a very big problem with public relations and trust in its aircraft, so they are trying to build goodwill and at the same time curry favor with these local authorities charged with investigating the accidents.”

Esther Wanyoike, sister of victim George Kabau of Kenya, issued a statement Wednesday saying Boeing is “just trying to win public confidence … (and) focused upon putting the 737 Max in the air.”

“That money shall all be stolen by NGOs and corrupt local government officials if it lands in Kenya,” Wanyoike said.

Lawsuits on different tracks

Marks said the main concern of the families of the victims is to find out “exactly why these tragedies occurred and what needs done to prevent similar accidents in future.” He said they want “full disclosure and complete transparency of all the information” Boeing has related to the cause of the accidents.

The lawsuits brought on behalf of the victims’ families in the two accidents are currently on separate tracks.

Over Boeing’s objections, the federal judge overseeing the Ethiopian Airlines crash lawsuits in Illinois, where Boeing is based, has allowed the plaintiffs to begin the discovery process to obtain information from the company.

Plaintiffs will be looking for evidence of Boeing taking shortcuts in the certification process, as well as the design features, pilot training and what actions occurred between the two crashes, Clifford said.

In this case, some families welcome early settlement talks, but a strong body of families wants answers on what caused the crash, he said.

The lawsuits stemming from the Lion Air crash in Indonesia are in the hands of another Illinois federal judge, and Boeing has a pending motion to move the case for trial to Indonesia.

UW’s Feldman said that “for whatever reason, (Boeing) believes it would be better off with the case there.” He cited precedent for this, for example a 1981 case of a Piper aircraft crash in Scotland, which the U.S. Supreme Court moved to that country, “even though Scottish law was much less favorable to the plaintiffs than was U.S. law.”

It’s likely that a court in Indonesia might provide lower damages than a U.S. court.

Morning Briefing Newsletter envelope icon
Get a rundown of the latest local and regional news every Mon-Fri morning.

In the meantime, with this potential change of venue providing some leverage for Boeing, there is a stay on liability claims in the Lion Air case. They won’t move forward, to allow settlement talks with the crash families.

Marks said that for these families, he’s “pursuing an aggressive, fast-paced settlement track.”

The 737 MAX fleet has been grounded worldwide since days after the second crash in March, creating a crisis of confidence for Boeing and upending plans by dozens of its airline customers worldwide.

Loading...