<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Friday,  April 26 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Opinion / Letters to the Editor

Letter: Relief bill filled with pork

By James Ault, Vancouver
Published: April 3, 2020, 6:00am

“Never let a crisis go to waste.” The coronavirus was the perfect opportunity for Congress to do what it so often does; namely, spend money it doesn’t have on projects that people don’t need. The relief package to extend worker’s compensation and direct cash and credit to mandated laid-off employees was itself infected with nonemergency spending. Expenditures such as art funding, nullifying voter ID laws, airplane engine efficiency, federal mandated early voting/ballot harvesting, solar panels and wind turbines, and countless diversity issues were affixed to this life-support bill that delayed its passage and much-needed relief.

None of these extraneous programs could pass on their own merits under normal congressional order (co-sponsors, committee hearings, amendments, floor voting). The only antidote to this infectious spending is a presidential line-item veto, already conferred on the vast majority of the governors. The current Supreme Court would likely uphold this much-needed fiscal discipline.

We encourage readers to express their views about public issues. Letters to the editor are subject to editing for brevity and clarity. Limit letters to 200 words (100 words if endorsing or opposing a political candidate or ballot measure) and allow 30 days between submissions. Send Us a Letter
Loading...