<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=192888919167017&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Wednesday,  July 17 , 2024

Linkedin Pinterest
News / Business

NOAA issues opinion on Jordan Cove plan

It says proposed LNG project won’t jeopardize protected species, habitat

By The World
Published: January 20, 2020, 6:39pm

COOS BAY — On Jan. 10, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association issued a final biological opinion on the construction and operation of the Jordan Cove Energy terminal in Coos Bay and the associated 229-mile-long Pacific Connector Liquefied Natural Gas pipeline, deeming that the project’s proposed actions do not jeopardize protected species or adversely modify their critical habitat.

NOAA began its biological determination after receiving the Final Environmental Impact Statement from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Within FERC’s EIS, there is a biological assessment that needs to be reviewed by NOAA, with NOAA reporting its findings back to FERC as part of the permitting process.

“We then consider that assessment based on our knowledge of the area and make site visits if necessary to verify it,” NOAA spokesman Michael Milstein said. “Then we bring the latest and best available science on the affected species and weigh the impacts against that to determine whether they are affected, and if so, to what degree, for how long, and over what area. Based on that, we judge whether the project jeopardizes the species or its likelihood of recovery.”

According to NOAA, its biological opinion considered the effects of construction and operation of the terminal and pipeline on 17 species listed under the Endangered Species Act and their critical habitats. NOAA Fisheries determined that because impacts on the species and their habitats would occur only in the short-term or on small scales, the proposed actions do not jeopardize these species.

“We certainly found that there will be some significant impacts in places, there’s no getting around that,” Milstein said. “Given that it’s a relatively short-term duration and in limited areas, and as far as the pipeline goes spread out over a large area, they’re not going to jeopardize the recovery of the species.”

Some of the 17 affected species considered include whales, sea turtles, salmon and other fish species.

“Between species, like for the marine mammals, we looked at things like ship collision potentials, oil spills and things like that. For coho salmon, they looked at habitat impacts both in the rivers and in surrounding areas, like road building that could potentially cause erosion that could run into the streams,” Milstein said.

NOAA said that the Pembina Pipeline Corporation is committed to important best management practices that would reduce effects on listed species, and proposed mitigation measures that will benefit species in the long term.

The pipeline would connect the terminal to other major pipelines in the West, linking it to gas supplies across the United States and Canada. The terminal in Coos Bay would be capable of liquefying up to 1.04 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day for export to markets around the world.